[SGVLUG] Oh no!

[matti]

Hey! filesystems -

Dan, Matt, would either of you be interested
in presenting on filesystems to sgvlug?

thanks!
matti

ps - we're always looking for presenters

--- On Mon, 9/12/11, Dan Kegel <dank at kegel.com> wrote:

> From: Dan Kegel <dank at kegel.com>
> Subject: Re: [SGVLUG] Oh no!
> To: "SGVLUG Discussion List." <sgvlug at sgvlug.net>
> Date: Monday, September 12, 2011, 6:54 AM
> I saw some discussion at
>   http://lwn.net/Articles/454347/
> in which Chris said
> "Posted Aug 8, 2011 16:08 UTC (Mon) by masoncl (subscriber,
> #47138)
> It's really just juggling the features I want btrfsck to
> have with
> keeping up with QA and patch review on the kernel bits.
> We have a lot of very active development work going on, and
> while my
> all of my R&D time on is fsck, I still need to patch
> and test the
> kernel parts too. I did let a few distractions creep in,
> such as
> redoing the metadata locking in 3.1-rc1, but that was a
> major
> performance bottleneck.
> I think f17 is a better choice for Fedora. We're working in
> parallel
> on the fsck and closing off the few remaining performance
> issues."
> 
> No, I don't know him personally, but given how much useful
> stuff his
> group has actually delivered, I'm inclined to believe him.
> (And zfs still doesn't have an offline fsck at all, so he's
> ahead of
> them there already.)
> - Dan
> 
> On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 8:56 PM, Matthew Campbell <dvdmatt at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Slack cut.
> >
> > If you know him I'll do it without prejudice.  Did
> you check out the
> > email chain?  It looks like this has been going on
> for a while.
> >
> > Matt
> >
> > On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 6:44 PM, Dan Kegel <dank at kegel.com>
> wrote:
> >> On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 6:25 PM, Matthew Campbell
> <dvdmatt at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg11954.html
> >>>
> >>> It looks like this has been going on since
> last November.  The guy
> >>> over at Oracle keeps putting the community
> off.  My FS got corrupted
> >>> in a power supply where my UPS battery died.
>  I have been waiting a
> >>> month for this fix, it looks like a lot of
> people have been waiting
> >>> much longer.
> >>>
> >>> Is this the future of Linux courtesy of
> Oracle?
> >>
> >> Aw, cut Chris Mason some slack.
> >> If you trust him with your bits, you ought to
> trust him when
> >> he says that it's all he's working on right now.
> >>
> >> (I'm really looking forward to the btrfs
> switchover, too.)
> >> - Dan
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Matthew Campbell
> > Storage Solution Consultant
> > Storage Platform Engineering Management
> > IT | Kaiser Permanente
> >
>