[SGVLUG] Is poking fun at Microsoft ever "off topic"?

[John E. Kreznar]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

"Munjal Thakkar" <m00njal at gmail.com> writes:

> I went to a workshop today demoing Office 2007, while it's not vista,
> performed and actually works very well.  Very powerful and organized
> collaboration between programs and a lot of powerful tools for businesses, I
> highly reccommend everyone to at least take a gander at the new office
> suite, its actually something to finally credit M$ for.

Does it have a EULA which forbids reverse engineering?  Does anyone
know how much one can learn about it before learning any more
constitutes reverse engineering?

- -- 
 John E. Kreznar jek at ininx.com 9F1148454619A5F08550 705961A47CC541AFEF13

 To "reverse engineer" something is to come to comprehend it, so what a
EULA really does is to forbid comprehension.  For this they charge money?!

   ... but most of all, the Microsoft team work to keep their
   customers ignorant (anything else would be "reverse engineering",
   forbidden by the EULA), because they know that if their customers
   stop being ignorant, they won't need Microsoft anymore.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8+ <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>

iD8DBQFF3EXZYaR8xUGv7xMRAgg6AJ9Zcd7ETRF3vXmseL7etrDiqVrgUgCfWE21
d1MNQCzz2C6M4p+K7h5hFuQ=
=bDVu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----