[SGVLUG] Time to boot getting longer with Debian
John E. Kreznar
jek at ininx.com
Fri Apr 21 01:03:31 PDT 2006
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
"John E. Kreznar" <jek at ininx.com> writes:
> David Lawyer <dave at lafn.org> writes:
> > I just installed kernel 2.6.15 ...
> > I could just revert to 2.6.12 but 2.6.15 in Debian has improved in
> > some ways: It's complied for a 486 instead of a 386 (2.6.12). Also
> > it doesn't load nearly as many unused modules like 2.6.12 did.
> What's surprising to me about this is that Debian does not seem now to
> have a kernel-source-2.6.x package for any x greater than 8. ...
> What's going on here? What am I missing? ...
Ah -- looks like they changed the package name from kernel-source-xxx
to linux-source-xxx. Sorry for the distraction.
- --
John E. Kreznar jek at ininx.com 9F1148454619A5F08550 705961A47CC541AFEF13
To "reverse engineer" something is to come to comprehend it, so what a
EULA really does is to forbid comprehension. For this they charge money?!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>
iD8DBQFESJHJYaR8xUGv7xMRAmcDAJ4jjIP1BoneI9mY/ZBZXaV1EEQqiwCfbpgZ
qXjz9wXiq53Wf/mkhF0VTlk=
=Y068
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the SGVLUG
mailing list