[SGVLUG] Http Host header

[Doug Vargas]

Thanks michael, glad to hear it's never been an issue, that's kind of 
what I figured but it's good to get it confirmed

On 12/13/2012 05:37 PM, Michael Proctor-Smith wrote:
> Never had a problem, it is not really Lazyness it is being a good net 
> citizen by conserving ip addresses. Plus what clients don't speak 1.1 
> at this point?
>
> Only time you do not see host header, is when it is a script kiddy or 
> someone trying to write there own client.
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 4:56 PM, <dougvargas at sbcglobal.net 
> <mailto:dougvargas at sbcglobal.net>> wrote:
>
>     So I guess I'll probably be asking everybody this in person in a
>     few hours, but has anybody ever had problems with http 1.0 clients
>     not using the 1.1 'Host' header in servers that serve multiple
>     sites? I can't really imagine it's a problem and I would really
>     rather avoid the hassle of requisitioning and setting up multiple
>     ips. Lazyness ftw!
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sgvlug.net/pipermail/sgvlug/attachments/20121213/b0648c5c/attachment.html>