[SGVLUG] interesting, border inspection issues
John E. Kreznar
jek at ininx.com
Thu May 8 17:04:28 PDT 2008
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
"Dan Borne" <danborne.kde at gmail.com> writes:
> I as well find it to be of interest, but has anyone ever actually
> ever had to open their laptop and share information with the
> officials?
The following story has appeared (and others).
- --
John E. Kreznar jek at ininx.com 9F1148454619A5F08550 705961A47CC541AFEF13
Imagine there's no countries / to kill or die for --John Lennon, 1971
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/06/AR2008020604763.html
Clarity Sought on Electronics Searches
U.S. Agents Seize Travelers' Devices
By Ellen Nakashima
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, February 7, 2008; Page A01
Nabila Mango, a therapist and a U.S. citizen who has lived in the
country since 1965, had just flown in from Jordan last December when,
she said, she was detained at customs and her cellphone was taken from
her purse. Her daughter, waiting outside San Francisco International
Airport, tried repeatedly to call her during the hour and a half she
was questioned. But after her phone was returned, Mango saw that
records of her daughter's calls had been erased.
A few months earlier in the same airport, a tech engineer returning
from a business trip to London objected when a federal agent asked him
to type his password into his laptop computer. "This laptop doesn't
belong to me," he remembers protesting. "It belongs to my company."
Eventually, he agreed to log on and stood by as the officer copied the
Web sites he had visited, said the engineer, a U.S. citizen who spoke
on the condition of anonymity for fear of calling attention to
himself.
Maria Udy, a marketing executive with a global travel management firm
in Bethesda, said her company laptop was seized by a federal agent as
she was flying from Dulles International Airport to London in December
2006. Udy, a British citizen, said the agent told her he had "a
security concern" with her. "I was basically given the option of
handing over my laptop or not getting on that flight," she said.
<snip>
The seizure of electronics at U.S. borders has prompted protests from
travelers who say they now weigh the risk of traveling with sensitive
or personal information on their laptops, cameras or cellphones. In
some cases, companies have altered their policies to require
employees to safeguard corporate secrets by clearing laptop hard
drives before international travel.
Today, the
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/related/topic/Electronic+Frontier+Foundation?tid=informline>Electronic
Frontier Foundation and Asian Law Caucus, two civil liberties groups
in
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/related/topic/San+Francisco?tid=informline>San
Francisco, plan to file a lawsuit to force the government to disclose
its policies on border searches, including which rules govern the
seizing and copying of the contents of electronic devices. They also
want to know the boundaries for asking travelers about their
political views, religious practices and other activities potentially
protected by the First Amendment. The question of whether border
agents have a right to search electronic devices at all without
suspicion of a crime is already under review in the federal courts.
The lawsuit was inspired by two dozen cases, 15 of which involved
searches of cellphones, laptops, MP3 players and other electronics.
Almost all involved travelers of Muslim, Middle Eastern or South
Asian background, many of whom, including Mango and the tech
engineer, said they are concerned they were singled out because of
racial or religious profiling.
A
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/related/topic/U.S.+Customs+and+Border+Protection?tid=informline>U.S.
Customs and Border Protection spokeswoman, Lynn Hollinger, said
officers do not engage in racial profiling "in any way, shape or
form." She said that "it is not CBP's intent to subject travelers to
unwarranted scrutiny" and that a laptop may be seized if it contains
information possibly tied to terrorism, narcotics smuggling, child
pornography or other criminal activity.
The reason for a search is not always made clear. The Association of
Corporate Travel Executives, which represents 2,500 business
executives in the United States and abroad, said it has tracked
complaints from several members, including Udy, whose laptops have
been seized and their contents copied before usually being returned
days later, said Susan Gurley, executive director of ACTE. Gurley
said none of the travelers who have complained to the ACTE raised
concerns about racial or ethnic profiling. Gurley said none of the
travelers were charged with a crime.
"I was assured that my laptop would be given back to me in 10 or 15
days," said Udy, who continues to fly into and out of the United
States. She said the federal agent copied her log-on and password,
and asked her to show him a recent document and how she gains access
to
<http://financial.washingtonpost.com/custom/wpost/html-qcn.asp?dispnav=business&mwpage=qcn&symb=MSFT&nav=el>Microsoft
Word. She was asked to pull up her e-mail but could not because of
lack of Internet access. With ACTE's help, she pressed for relief.
More than a year later, Udy has received neither her laptop nor an explanation.
ACTE last year filed a Freedom of Information Act request to press
the government for information on what happens to data seized from
laptops and other electronic devices. "Is it destroyed right then and
there if the person is in fact just a regular business traveler?"
Gurley asked. "People are quite concerned. They don't want
proprietary business information floating, not knowing where it has
landed or where it is going. It increases the anxiety level."
Udy has changed all her work passwords and no longer banks online.
Her company, Radius, has tightened its data policies so that
traveling employees must access company information remotely via an
encrypted channel, and their laptops must contain no company information.
At least two major global corporations, one American and one Dutch,
have told their executives not to carry confidential business
material on laptops on overseas trips, Gurley said. In
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/related/topic/Canada?tid=informline>Canada,
one law firm has instructed its lawyers to travel to the United
States with "blank laptops" whose hard drives contain no data. "We
just access our information through the Internet," said Lou
Brzezinski, a partner at Blaney McMurtry, a major
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/related/topic/Toronto?tid=informline>Toronto
law firm. That approach also holds risks, but "those are hacking
risks as opposed to search risks," he said.
The U.S. government has argued in a pending court case that its
authority to protect the country's border extends to looking at
information stored in electronic devices such as laptops without any
suspicion of a crime. In border searches, it regards a laptop the
same as a suitcase.
"It should not matter . . . whether documents and pictures are kept
in 'hard copy' form in an executive's briefcase or stored digitally
in a computer. The authority of customs officials to search the
former should extend equally to searches of the latter," the
government argued in the child pornography case being heard by a
three-judge panel of the Court of Appeals for the
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/related/topic/U.S.+Court+of+Appeals?tid=informline>9th
Circuit in San Francisco.
As more and more people travel with laptops,
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/related/topic/BlackBerry+Mobile+Devices?tid=informline>BlackBerrys
and cellphones, the government's laptop-equals-suitcase position is
raising red flags.
"It's one thing to say it's reasonable for government agents to open
your luggage," said David D. Cole, a law professor at
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/related/topic/Georgetown+University?tid=informline>Georgetown
University. "It's another thing to say it's reasonable for them to
read your mind and everything you have thought over the last year.
What a laptop records is as personal as a diary but much more
extensive. It records every Web site you have searched. Every e-mail
you have sent. It's as if you're crossing the border with your home
in your suitcase."
If the government's position on searches of electronic files is
upheld, new risks will confront anyone who crosses the border with a
laptop or other device, said Mark Rasch, a technology security expert
with
<http://financial.washingtonpost.com/custom/wpost/html-qcn.asp?dispnav=business&mwpage=qcn&symb=FCN&nav=el>FTI
Consulting and a former federal prosecutor. "Your kid can be arrested
because they can't prove the songs they downloaded to their
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/related/topic/Apple+iPod?tid=informline>iPod
were legally downloaded," he said. "Lawyers run the risk of exposing
sensitive information about their client. Trade secrets can be
exposed to customs agents with no limit on what they can do with it.
Journalists can expose sources, all because they have the audacity to
cross an invisible line."
Hollinger said customs officers "are trained to protect confidential
information."
Shirin Sinnar, a staff attorney with the Asian Law Caucus, said that
by scrutinizing the Web sites people search and the phone numbers
they've stored on their cellphones, "the government is going well
beyond its traditional role of looking for contraband and really is
looking into the content of people's thoughts and ideas and their
lawful political activities."
If conducted inside the country, such searches would require a
warrant and probable cause, legal experts said.
Customs sometimes singles out passengers for extensive questioning
and searches based on "information from various systems and specific
techniques for selecting passengers," including the Interagency
Border Inspection System, according to a statement on the
<http://www.cbp.gov/xp/cgov/travel/admissability/authority_to_search.xml>CBP
Web site. "CBP officers may, unfortunately, inconvenience law-abiding
citizens in order to detect those involved in illicit activities,"
the statement said. But the factors agents use to single out
passengers are not transparent, and travelers generally have little
access to the data to see whether there are errors.
Although Customs said it does not profile by race or ethnicity, an
officers' training guide states that "it is permissible and indeed
advisable to consider an individual's connections to countries that
are associated with significant terrorist activity."
"What's the difference between that and targeting people because they
are Arab or Muslim?" Cole said, noting that the countries the
government focuses on are generally predominantly Arab or Muslim.
It is the lack of clarity about the rules that has confounded
travelers and raised concerns from groups such as the Asian Law
Caucus, which said that as a result, their lawyers cannot fully
advise people how they may exercise their rights during a border
search. The lawsuit says a Freedom of Information Act request was
filed with Customs last fall but that no information has been received.
Kamran Habib, a software engineer with
<http://financial.washingtonpost.com/custom/wpost/html-qcn.asp?dispnav=business&mwpage=qcn&symb=CSCO&nav=el>Cisco
Systems, has had his laptop and cellphone searched three times in the
past year. Once, in San Francisco, an officer "went through every
number and text message on my cellphone and took out my SIM card in
the back," said Habib, a permanent U.S. resident. "So now, every time
I travel, I basically clean out my phone. It's better for me to keep
my colleagues and friends safe than to get them on the list as well."
Udy's company, Radius, organizes business trips for 100,000 travelers
a day, from companies around the world. She says her firm supports
strong security measures. "Where we get angry is when we don't know
what they're for."
Staff researcher Richard Drezen contributed to this report.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8+ <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>
iD8DBQFII5TwYaR8xUGv7xMRAjp3AJ9hNeEkbV2YN8b87oYoj+5Lz/1/vwCeMlMv
GyzGjbg00H5kdDWyrNEeVyU=
=/pN6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the SGVLUG
mailing list