[SGVLUG] Burning laptop anyone?

[Sean O'Donnell]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

here's what I was talking about...

http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/medicalnews.php?newsid=17664

heh... FUD!

Dustin Laurence wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 03:33:03PM -0700, Dustin Laurence wrote:
>> However, I've never heard of this being a long-term issue.  Is anyone
>> suggesting that you should never wear briefs if you *ever* want to have
>> children?
> 
> I just noticed our copy of "Taking Charge of Your Fertility".  It is
> about female fertility, not male fertility, but it does say that it can
> take up to 72 days to produce a sperm cell.  So my guess is that if you
> are not now trying to conceive and you are not planning to in the next
> two and a half months, it doesn't matter.
> 
> And for many men it doesn't matter anyway.  The design works quite well
> under less-than-optimal conditions (hmm, suppose there is survival value
> in that?), so generally people don't worry about these details unless
> they have tried and are having difficulty, or tests show low sperm
> counts.
> 
> Remember, people wearing briefs have impregnated their wives just fine
> for a long time.  In particular, we conceived twice that way.  The first
> was a miscarriage, the second resulted in a very fine small boy named
> Eric who is the apple of his daddy's eye and is approaching his second
> birthday. :-)
> 
> Dustin

- --

Sean O'Donnell
South Pasadena, CA
sean at seanodonnell.com
http://seanodonnell.com

PGP Public Key ID: 0xAC769035
PGP Public Key Server: http://pgp.mit.edu

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFE9jaTCUrh+ax2kDURAqSCAJ40tHKF/uc4Nae0dj2mMAhMBgKD6wCdEYXw
IMNW67YXs6HDQKJeFsxpaOk=
=PWl9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----