[SGVLUG] Reply-to munging

[Jeremy Leader]

Michael Proctor-Smith wrote:
> Answer this question in private(check you to address the list forces
> reply to the list) to me: mproctor13 at gmail.com

This caution wouldn't be quite so necessary, and replying in
private would be a little easier, if the SGVLUG list didn't
insist on setting the Reply-To header.

See http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
for a discussion of why having a mailing list set the Reply-To
header is a bad idea.

I vaguely remember this being brought up before, I think the
list software at the time made such munging hard to avoid;
perhaps the new software is more easily configured?

-- 
Jeremy Leader
jleader at alumni.caltech.edu
leaderj at yahoo-inc.com (work)