[SGVLUG] archives??? since when?
Dustin
laurence at alice.caltech.edu
Thu Sep 8 17:05:13 PDT 2005
On Thu, 8 Sep 2005, Hershel Remer wrote:
> Nah, we have Matt doing that for us. Why else do you think I sent him in
> tonight? ;-)
I had not considered that Matt is but your minion. The puppetmaster is
revealed at last!
> I am fine with anyone joining the list and reading my emails. That was never
> my complaint.
Well, I agree that notice would have been the Right Thing--not the least
so that people knew they could take advantage of it. But I don't see why,
given that it is done, we should remove it.
> Well, there's no time like to the present to start building your own archive
> with whatever falls into your mailbox starting from when you join. :-)
True, but I think it's better to have the archive. I know that one of the
most useful tools I have when I join a mailing list is to search the
archives, both to get a sense of what the list standards are and also so
that I can avoid any questions that have been done to death. In fact, I
very often curse lists that lack an archive between clenched teeth.
> Rabbs is chasing [my] CSI !!
It's an industry town, so I'd be disappointed if you weren't. :-)
Dustin, waiting impatiently so he can set up a MythTV DVR to record the
premier of "Rabbi Brownstein, Orthodox Detective"
More information about the SGVLUG
mailing list