<p>Nobody up for a "sudo rm -f /*" I know it's the one I have the most fun with. </p>
<p>I do it for fun when I know I'm starting over, but I always physically remove network all cables, wifi cards, and USB drives before I enjoy the chaos. Can never be too safe with that one. Couldn't resist.</p>
<p>Any rdesktop users out there? A must if you manage any Windows boxes.</p>
<p>Sent from mobile.</p>
<div class="gmail_quote">On May 12, 2012 5:38 PM, "Christopher Smith" <<a href="mailto:cbsmith@gmail.com">cbsmith@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
On May 12, 2012, at 4:16 PM, Braddock Gaskill <<a href="mailto:braddock@braddock.com">braddock@braddock.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
><br>
> On Sat, 12 May 2012 15:48:58 -0700, Christopher Smith <<a href="mailto:cbsmith@gmail.com">cbsmith@gmail.com</a>><br>
> wrote:<br>
>> Wow. Someone who uses Emacs *and* screen. That's a new one.<br>
><br>
> Of course you HAVE to remap that ctrl-A!<br>
><br>
> Heh, back when I was an emacs user (before it gave me carpel tunnel that<br>
> is), I also used screen.<br>
><br>
> Even though I am thoroughly vim these days, out of habit I still do<br>
> screen -e^tt<br>
<br>
We're talking emacs here. No key is safe. ;-)<br>
<br>
The larger issue though is that emacs is already its own, superior, screen. Obviously, some disagree on that matter.<br>
<br>
--Chris</blockquote></div>