Clinton and Bush Sr. did nearly the same thing. They would have someone go through all your college papers and theses or any published works looking for any red flag. Obama is vetting for subversive or just plain irresponsible blog postings. I think it is necessary to an extent. Remember this is the <b>public</b> sector; even your salary is not private. If anyone is worried about the vetting, they shouldn't apply.<br>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 6:43 PM, Dan Borne <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:danborne.kde@gmail.com">danborne.kde@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
I think with everything that anyone on here has posted, it might be better just to lie, for one thing may pass through...<br><br><br>Isn't that illegal? That seems like unnecessary invasion of privacy. <br><br>Cheers!<br>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">2008/11/14 matti <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mathew_2000@yahoo.com" target="_blank">mathew_2000@yahoo.com</a>></span><div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c"><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br>
lol!<br>
<br>
my brain must have been thinking of programming<br>
when I wrote this...<br>
<br>
I meant applicants. ;)<br>
<br>
<br>
Re: [SGVLUG] Privacy Rights - Obama demands full disclosure from applications<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div></div></div><br>
</blockquote></div><br>