Yup, you did. - <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=196901062">http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=196901062</a><br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 1/19/07,
<b class="gmail_sendername">Robert Leyva</b> <<a href="mailto:mrflash818@geophile.net">mrflash818@geophile.net</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br><br>For those interested in security I thought this might be interesting, and<br>believe I found it from a link on slashdot, with the original article<br>being from Information Week, but can't remember for sure now.
<br><br>---------------------------- Original Message ----------------------------<br>Subject: rootkit detectors<br><br>--------------------------------------------------------------------------<br><br>...it was one of the independent tools — Rootkit Unhooker
<br>— that turned out to be the best. I'm not sure that means the big vendors<br>will see them as competition, though, since the indie-written tools<br>clearly are meant for self-appointed pros.<br><br><br>--<br>"Knowledge is Power" -- Francis Bacon
<br><br>Robert Leyva<br><a href="mailto:mrflash818@geophile.net">mrflash818@geophile.net</a><br><br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Matthew Gallizzi