[SGVLUG] Privacy Rights - Obama demands full disclosure from applications

[Matt Campbell]

Can 'Cary on...' be interpreted as approval of the views expressed in this
conversation?

;)

Matt

> -----Original Message-----
> From: sgvlug-bounces at sgvlug.net [mailto:sgvlug-bounces at sgvlug.net] On
> Behalf Of Sean O'Donnell
> Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2008 10:28 AM
> To: SGVLUG Discussion List.
> Subject: Re: [SGVLUG] Privacy Rights - Obama demands full disclosure
> from applications
> 
> I was going to respond to this post, but I'm afraid that it'll
> jeopardize my future career in the world of psycho politics, so I think
> I'll refrain from comment, at this time. Carry on...
> 
> matti wrote:
> > Geez!
> >
> > NO F'n way could I even produce 1/2 of the
> > comments I've posted on the net if
> > asked...
> >
> > I'm wondering if ANYONE whose used the
> > net for any significant period of time
> > can produce a 1/2 decent record of their
> > "freely spoken" rants and raves
> >
> > Would-be Obama aides must disclose Web posts, Facebook profiles
> > http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-10097448-38.html
> >
> >
> >
> > best comment I've seen
> > "I think this requirement might this time keep the best people from
> the right places."
> >
> > hmmm... I wonder what is the most common alias someone
> > has used for online speech.
> >
> > lol, tho I guess it would be funny to read the
> > flame wars of various cabinet members ( like the
> > potential secretary of state.. )
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >