[SGVLUG] GPL and CPL
Emerson, Tom (*IC)
Tom.Emerson at wbconsultant.com
Fri Apr 27 12:06:03 PDT 2007
> -----Original Message----- Of matti
>
> Looks like the basic answer is here:
>
> "Laszlo Systems chose the CPL because it [...]
> permit[s] proprietary applications written using OpenLaszlo
> to remain proprietary, but ensures that any contributions to
> the OpenLaszlo platform itself remain open source and are
> "given back" to the open source community."
They could still use the GPL for that -- after all, consider the
compiler (gcc) the GPL maintains a similar attitude about the
distinction between products made BY a GPL program vs. enhancements TO a
GPL program (and/or variations OF the GPL'd product)
Or to put it another way, the GPL does not extend to the OUTPUT of a GPL
program.
As to the rest of the CPL, I have a longer thought on it I started last
night (but fell asleep before hitting "send"), but the long and short of
it is, "this just sounds weird..."
More information about the SGVLUG
mailing list