[SGVLUG] FC repository searches

[Dustin Laurence]

On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 02:47:20PM -0700, Michael Proctor-Smith wrote:
> 
> It may have to do with the fact that I think centOS was started by
> guys who wanted to sell support(I think if I remeber correctly, I
> could be wrong).

I doubt it--there are several other rebuilds that are definitely
commercial, and they get away with it, and CentOS supposedly meant
Community ENTerprise OS, which doesn't sound aimed at a mainly
commercial operation to me.

> ...The other part is that regular poeple most of the
> time can't read letters that lawyers send so they may have overracted,
> or removed Red Hat as a form of spite.

The point is that sending in the dogs isn't Our Way anyway.  Until
proven otherwise I remain convinced that RH didn't act as it should
have.

That said, it wasn't a major issue, since we *do* all know the score.  I
can live with it, if it doesn't become a major pattern.

Dustin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.sgvlug.net/pipermail/sgvlug/attachments/20060912/ba2c3395/attachment.bin