[SGVLUG] PRIVACY???

[John E. Kreznar]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Dustin <laurence at alice.caltech.edu> writes:

> On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, John E. Kreznar wrote:

> > Almost all Web browsing from this site is via anonymizing remailers
> > with hours of latency.

> Fine for most sites, not fine for frequently updated pages ...

Yep.

> Do you have it set up so the anonymizing system is optional or
> mandatory?

It's optional, but it's the default.  Things here are deliberately
arranged so that it's difficult to inadvertently put something on the
Internet, such as the usual chatter between browser and server.

> I could see having it set up so relatively static sites go through
> the mail-based system you mention and news sites go through
> something like Tor.

Actually, I take news that way too, but it doesn't go into the usual
archive.

> ... the design constraint of being interactive wouldn't allow nearly
> so effective a smearing function.

Exactly.

> I'd be interested in knowing the details of your set-up, but I don't
> think I would set it up now ...

Maybe a good idea.  It's quite persnickety.

> ... so I hate to have you go to the trouble of writing it up for me.

It would be off-topic for this mailing list anyway.  Most people don't
care enough for privacy to be bothered, it appears.

Thanks for your interest!

- -- 
 John E. Kreznar jek at ininx.com 9F1148454619A5F08550 705961A47CC541AFEF13
  ... who has not requested or consented to any political jurisdiction.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.6 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>

iD8DBQFDOaj4YaR8xUGv7xMRAlYlAJ9hRUGs83CA/3CPq+jupKvcnNsvuACfTKrB
KIyeURrYFahSv+IynLCjEmo=
=BJR+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----